Neural Network Architectures

From Simple Perceptrons to Transformers

Understanding the evolution of neural network architectures is crucial for applying AI to biological problems. This guide compares five foundational architectures—MLP, DNN, CNN, RNN, and Transformer—exploring their structures, strengths, limitations, and applications in computational biology and drug discovery.

Why Architecture Matters in AI4Bio

The choice of neural network architecture fundamentally determines what patterns your model can learn and how efficiently it can process biological data. Each architecture evolved to solve specific challenges:

Depth & Capacity

Deeper networks can learn more complex hierarchical representations, essential for understanding biological systems

Local Pattern Detection

CNNs excel at detecting spatial patterns like DNA motifs and features in medical images through convolution operations

Sequential Processing

Some biological data is inherently sequential (DNA sequences, time-series), requiring specialized architectures

Attention Mechanisms

Modern architectures can focus on relevant features, mimicking how researchers prioritize important biological signals

Computational Efficiency

Biological datasets are massive—architecture choice impacts training time and resource requirements

The Five Core Architectures

Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)

The foundational feedforward neural network with fully connected layers. Data flows in one direction from input to output, with each neuron connected to every neuron in the next layer.

Key Features:

Simple, interpretable architecture
Universal function approximator
No memory of previous inputs
Best for tabular, fixed-size inputs

💡 Biology Applications:

Predicting drug-target binding affinities
Classifying cell types from gene expression
Protein secondary structure prediction
Clinical outcome prediction from patient data

Deep Neural Network (DNN)

An extension of MLPs with many hidden layers (typically 5+). Deeper architectures enable learning of hierarchical representations, from simple features to complex patterns.

Key Features:

Hierarchical feature learning
Requires careful initialization and regularization
Can capture non-linear relationships
Vulnerable to vanishing gradients

💡 Biology Applications:

Multi-omics data integration
Complex disease phenotype prediction
Drug response modeling
Pathway analysis and gene regulatory networks

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)

Specialized networks designed for grid-like data using convolution operations. CNNs apply learnable filters to detect local patterns and features, with parameter sharing across spatial locations.

Key Features:

Convolution layers detect local patterns
Pooling layers reduce dimensionality
Parameter sharing through weight reuse
Translation invariance for pattern detection

💡 Biology Applications:

Medical image analysis (histopathology, radiology)
DNA/RNA motif discovery and binding site prediction
Protein contact map prediction
Microscopy image segmentation and cell classification

Recurrent Neural Network (RNN)

Networks with loops that allow information to persist across time steps. Each unit maintains a hidden state that captures information about previous inputs in the sequence.

Key Features:

Processes sequential data naturally
Variable-length input/output
Shares parameters across time steps
Struggles with long-range dependencies

💡 Biology Applications:

DNA/RNA sequence motif discovery
Protein sequence modeling
Time-series gene expression analysis
Trajectory inference in single-cell data

Transformer

Revolutionary architecture based on self-attention mechanisms. Processes entire sequences in parallel, learning which parts of the input to focus on without sequential processing.

Key Features:

Self-attention captures long-range dependencies
Highly parallelizable (fast training)
Position encoding for sequence order
Foundation of modern large language models

💡 Biology Applications:

Protein language models (ESM, ProtTrans)
Single-cell foundation models (scGPT, Geneformer)
Genomic sequence analysis
Multi-modal biological data integration

Architecture Comparison

Feature	MLP	DNN	CNN	RNN	Transformer
Input Type	Fixed-size vectors	Fixed-size vectors	Grid-like data (images, sequences)	Variable-length sequences	Variable-length sequences
Memory	None	None	None	Hidden state (short-term)	Self-attention (global)
Parallelization	High	High	High	Low (sequential)	Very High
Training Speed	Fast	Moderate	Fast (with GPUs)	Slow	Fast (with GPUs)
Local Patterns	Poor	Moderate	Excellent	Moderate	Good (with position encoding)
Long-range Dependencies	Poor	Poor	Poor	Limited	Excellent
Parameters	Low-Moderate	Moderate-High	Low (parameter sharing)	Moderate	Very High
Interpretability	Moderate	Low	Moderate (filter visualization)	Low	Moderate (attention maps)
Best For	Tabular data, simple classification	Complex feature learning	Images, local patterns, motifs	Short sequences, time-series	Long sequences, pre-training

Choosing the Right Architecture for Biology

Start with MLPs/DNNs if:

You have tabular biological data (gene expression matrices, clinical features)
Your features are pre-computed and fixed-length
You need fast training and interpretability
You're doing simple classification or regression tasks

Use CNNs if:

You're working with images (histopathology, microscopy)
You need to detect local patterns or motifs in sequences
You want parameter efficiency through weight sharing
You're analyzing DNA/RNA for binding sites or regulatory elements

Use RNNs (LSTM/GRU) if:

You're working with shorter biological sequences (< 1000 bp)
Temporal dynamics matter (time-course experiments)
You need to model sequential dependencies
You have limited computational resources

Choose Transformers if:

You're building foundation models for pre-training
You need to capture long-range interactions (full gene sequences, protein domains)
You have large datasets and GPU resources
You want to leverage transfer learning from existing models

Recent Trends in AI4Bio

The Transformer Revolution

Since 2020, Transformers have dominated biological AI applications. Models like ESM-2 (protein sequences), DNABERT (genomic sequences), and scGPT (single-cell transcriptomics) have achieved state-of-the-art results by pre-training on massive biological datasets and fine-tuning for specific tasks.

CNNs in Genomics and Imaging

CNNs remain the gold standard for image-based biology (histopathology, cell imaging) and continue to be widely used for genomic motif discovery. Models like DeepBind, Basset, and DeepSEA use CNNs to predict transcription factor binding and chromatin accessibility from DNA sequences.

Hybrid Architectures

Modern approaches often combine architectures. For example, scBERT uses Transformer encoders with MLP heads for cell type classification, while DeepCRISPR combines CNNs (for motif detection) with RNNs (for sequence modeling). AlphaFold2 uses attention mechanisms inspired by Transformers alongside specialized geometric operations.

Architecture Search

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is emerging in computational biology to automatically discover optimal architectures for specific biological tasks, reducing the need for manual architecture engineering.

Implementation Tips

Start Simple

Always baseline with an MLP/DNN before moving to complex architectures. Many biological tasks don't require Transformers.

CNNs for Local Patterns

When working with sequences or images, try CNNs first—they're parameter-efficient and excel at detecting motifs and local features.

Pre-training Matters

For sequence data, leverage pre-trained models (ESM-2, DNABERT) rather than training from scratch.

Data Preprocessing

Proper normalization, batch correction, and feature engineering often matter more than architecture choice.

Regularization

Biological datasets are often small—use dropout, weight decay, and early stopping to prevent overfitting.

📚 Continue Learning

Explore more machine learning concepts and their applications in computational biology

Back to Learning Hub Next: Batch Integration